Radeon Pro 5500M
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

Radeon Pro 5500M vs GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

AMD

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

2020Core: 1350 MHzBoost: 1485 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5500M is positioned at rank 23 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is on rank 50, so the Radeon Pro 5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5500M

#8
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
329%
#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
78%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
74%
#16
Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP: $429|Avg: $401
69%
#23
Radeon Pro 5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
99%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
89%
#33
Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $200
82%
#36
T600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
100%
#40
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
187%
#42
169%
#43
169%
#47
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
154%
#48
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
153%
#50
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75
100%
#53
GeForce GTX 980M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
97%
#54
GeForce GTX 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
96%
#58
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
93%
#62
Radeon 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
92%
#65
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5500M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon Pro 5500MGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%)
Leading raw performance (+3.5%)
Longevity
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5500M and GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

AMD

Radeon Pro 5500M

The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5500M scores 6,730 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) reaches 6,968 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 1485 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score
6,730
6,968+4%
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Turing
Process Node
7 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1536+50%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS+46%
3.041 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1450 MHz
1485 MHz+2%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
96+50%
64
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 5500M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro 5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) — the Radeon Pro 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Encoder
VCN 2.0
NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing)
Decoder
VCN 2.0
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5500M draws 85W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 51.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 87.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
TDP
85W
50W-41%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85-2%
87
Perf/Watt
79.2
139.4+76%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Avg Price (30d)
$75
Codename
Navi 14
TU116
Release
November 13 2019
April 23 2020
Ranking
#363
#324