Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon R9 285

AMD

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 285

2014Core: 918 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon R9 285 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon R9 285 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon R9 285: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019

Why buy it

  • 6.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 85W instead of 190W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Radeon R9 285

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 123.5% higher power demand at 190W vs 85W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 5500M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (6,730 vs 6,680), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 5500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 285 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 285 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 5500M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon R9 285 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5500M

The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 285

The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5500M scores 6,730 and the Radeon R9 285 reaches 6,680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285). Raw compute: 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MRadeon R9 285
G3D Mark Score
6,730
6,680
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
7 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
1792+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS+35%
3.29 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
96
112+17%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MRadeon R9 285
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 5500M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro 5500M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5500M and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) — the Radeon Pro 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MRadeon R9 285
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 285). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MRadeon R9 285
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MRadeon R9 285
Encoder
VCN 2.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
VCN 2.0
UVD 5.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5500M draws 85W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 76.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MRadeon R9 285
TDP
85W-55%
190W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
0mm
221mm
Height
0mm
109mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85
65°C-24%
Perf/Watt
79.2+125%
35.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5500M (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5500MRadeon R9 285
MSRP
$249
Codename
Navi 14
Tonga
Release
November 13 2019
September 2 2014
Ranking
#363
#365

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.