
Radeon Pro 5500M

Radeon R9 285
Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon R9 285 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon R9 285 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon R9 285: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅6.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 190W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Radeon R9 285
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌123.5% higher power demand at 190W vs 85W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 5500M vs Radeon R9 285 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 5500M
The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.

Radeon R9 285
The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5500M scores 6,730 and the Radeon R9 285 reaches 6,680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285). Raw compute: 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500M | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,730 | 6,680 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1792+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.454 TFLOPS+35% | 3.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 112+17% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500M | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5500M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro 5500M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5500M and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) — the Radeon Pro 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500M | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 285). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500M | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500M | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5500M draws 85W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 76.4% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500M | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-55% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 221mm |
| Height | 0mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 79.2+125% | 35.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5500M (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5500M | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Tonga |
| Release | November 13 2019 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #363 | #365 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














