
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 85W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 28.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌112.5% higher power demand at 85W vs 40W.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023Radeon Pro 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 85W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 28.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌112.5% higher power demand at 85W vs 40W.
Quick Answers
So, is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS better than Radeon Pro 5500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5500M make more sense than Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 76 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 47 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and Radeon Pro 5500M
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.

Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M
The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS scores 7,000 and the Radeon Pro 5500M reaches 6,730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,000+4% | 6,730 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz+3% | 1450 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500M has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5500M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | ES 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5500M).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Adreno VPU | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Adreno VPU | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro 5500M's 85W — a 72% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-53% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 175.0+121% | 79.2 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | — |
| Codename | — | Navi 14 |
| Release | October 26 2023 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #482 | #363 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












