Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Tesla M60

CPUCPUGPUGPU

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

2023Boost: 1500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M60

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
···
Buy on Amazon

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Tesla M60 Performance Spectrum

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Shared System RAM 40
7,000
0.0%
Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
Tesla M60
4 GB 300
7,002
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 750 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 580
brand logoGeForce GTX 670
brand logoGeForce MX570 A
brand logoGeForce GTX 980
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Tesla M60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,750 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 1099.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Tesla M60 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 40W instead of 300W, a 260W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Tesla M60

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    1100% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • ❌650% higher power demand at 300W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla M60 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0% in PassMark G3D (7,002 vs 7,000), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,750 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1099.7% (28.0 vs 2.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla M60 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Tesla M60 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla M60

The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS scores 7,000 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSTesla M60
G3D Mark Score
7,000
7,002
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
2048 ×2+33%
Boost Clock
1500 MHz+27%
1178 MHz
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSTesla M60
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla M60 carries 4 GB. Tesla M60 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and 256-bit on the Tesla M60.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSTesla M60
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSTesla M60
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
ES 3.2
4.5+41%
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSTesla M60
Encoder
Adreno VPU
NVENC 2.0 (2x)
Decoder
Adreno VPU
PureVideo HD VP6 (2x)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS draws 40W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 152.9% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSTesla M60
TDP
40W-87%
300W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Perf/Watt
175.0+651%
23.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS came in at $250, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. On MSRP, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS was 91.7% cheaper ($2750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS offers 1117.4% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSTesla M60
MSRP
$250-92%
$3000
Performance per Dollar
28.0+1117%
2.3
Codename
—
GM204
Release
October 26 2023
August 30 2015
Ranking
#482
#355
Search Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on AmazonSearch Tesla M60 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.