
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Radeon Pro 5300

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is positioned at rank 197 and the Radeon Pro 5300 is on rank 64, so the Radeon Pro 5300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 5300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS.
| Insight | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | Legacy (4nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 5300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $250 for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 69.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+69.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and Radeon Pro 5300
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.

Radeon Pro 5300
The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS scores 7,000 and the Radeon Pro 5300 reaches 7,125 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,000 | 7,125+2% |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1280 |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1650 MHz+10% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro 5300 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | ES 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Adreno VPU | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Adreno VPU | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 85W — a 72% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-53% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 175.0+109% | 83.8 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Radeon Pro 5300 launched at $300 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro 5300 costs 40% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 47.5 (Radeon Pro 5300) — the Radeon Pro 5300 offers 69.6% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-17% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $150-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.0 | 47.5+70% |
| Codename | — | Navi 14 |
| Release | October 26 2023 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #482 | #351 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











