Radeon Pro 555 vs Radeon R9 260

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 555 vs Radeon R9 260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 555 vs Radeon R9 260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 555

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 275W, a 200W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 260 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R9 260

2013

Why buy it

✅72.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌266.7% higher power demand at 275W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 260 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 72.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro 555 instead at 3,141 vs 3,048, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 555 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 260 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 260 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 555 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 555 vs Radeon R9 260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 555

The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.

Radeon R9 260

The Radeon R9 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,048 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 555 scores 3,141 and the Radeon R9 260 reaches 3,048 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 260). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 260).

Feature	Radeon Pro 555	Radeon R9 260
G3D Mark Score	3,141+3%	3,048
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2560+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.306 TFLOPS	4.849 TFLOPS+271%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	48	160+233%
L1 Cache	192 KB	640 KB+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 555	Radeon R9 260
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 555 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 260.

Feature	Radeon Pro 555	Radeon R9 260
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 555 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 260's 275W — a 114.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555) vs 450W (Radeon R9 260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon Pro 555	Radeon R9 260
TDP	75W-73%	275W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	41.9+277%	11.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 555 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 260 launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 555 was 100+% cheaper ($139 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) vs 21.9 (Radeon R9 260) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 555 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon Pro 555	Radeon R9 260
MSRP	$0-100%	$139
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	21.9
Codename	Polaris 21	Hawaii
Release	June 5 2017	November 5 2013
Ranking	#574	#316

Search Radeon Pro 555 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.