Radeon Pro 555 vs Radeon R9 360

AMD

Radeon Pro 555

2017Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Pro 555 vs Radeon R9 360 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 555 vs Radeon R9 360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 555 vs Radeon R9 360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 555

2017

Why buy it

  • 80.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Radeon R9 360

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 555 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 555 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 80.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (3,141 vs 3,032), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 555 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 360 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 360 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 555 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro 555 vs Radeon R9 360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro 555

The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 360

The Radeon R9 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,032 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 555 scores 3,141 and the Radeon R9 360 reaches 3,032 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 555 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 555) vs 512 (Radeon R9 360). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 360).

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Radeon R9 360
G3D Mark Score
3,141+4%
3,032
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.306 TFLOPS+38%
0.9472 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48+50%
32
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Radeon R9 360
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 555 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 360. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 360) — the Radeon Pro 555 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Radeon R9 360
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 555 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 360's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R9 360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 555) vs 350W (Radeon R9 360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Radeon R9 360
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
165mm
Height
110mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
41.9
101.1+141%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 555 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 360 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 555 was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) vs 30.6 (Radeon R9 360) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 555 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro 555Radeon R9 360
MSRP
$0-100%
$99
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
30.6
Codename
Polaris 21
Tropo
Release
June 5 2017
May 5 2015
Ranking
#574
#711

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.