
Radeon Pro 5600M vs Arc 7-Core iGPU

Radeon Pro 5600M
Popular choices:

Arc 7-Core iGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 5600M is positioned at rank 21 and the Arc 7-Core iGPU is on rank 82, so the Radeon Pro 5600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5600M
Performance Per Dollar Arc 7-Core iGPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc 7-Core iGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5600M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5600M | Arc 7-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | Standard Buffer (0 MB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc 7-Core iGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5600M and Arc 7-Core iGPU

Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.

Arc 7-Core iGPU
The Arc 7-Core iGPU is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,349 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5600M scores 9,324 and the Arc 7-Core iGPU reaches 9,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5600M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Arc 7-Core iGPU uses Xe LPG, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 7 (Arc 7-Core iGPU). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | Arc 7-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,324 | 9,349 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+36471% | 7 |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | 2200 MHz+114% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | Arc 7-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5600M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc 7-Core iGPU has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro 5600M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | Arc 7-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc 7-Core iGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | Arc 7-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs QuickSync (Arc 7-Core iGPU). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9,MPEG-2 (Arc 7-Core iGPU).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | Arc 7-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5600M draws 50W versus the Arc 7-Core iGPU's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Arc 7-Core iGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 500W (Arc 7-Core iGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 95.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | Arc 7-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 15W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C-5% | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 186.5 | 623.3+234% |
Value Analysis
The Arc 7-Core iGPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | Arc 7-Core iGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $0 |
| Codename | Navi 12 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | June 15 2020 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #283 | #375 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















