Radeon Pro 5600M vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Radeon Pro 5600M
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro 5600M is positioned at rank #21 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5600M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5600M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Pro 5600M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5600M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5600M | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 780 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5600M and GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5600M scores 9,324 and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti reaches 9,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5600M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Raw compute: 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 928 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,324 | 9,469+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2880+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.274 TFLOPS | 5.345 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz+11% | 928 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5600M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB. The Radeon Pro 5600M offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the Radeon Pro 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+167% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5600M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 780 Ti's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-80% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 83°C-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 186.5+392% | 37.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5600M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5600M | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $42 |
| Codename | Navi 12 | GK110B |
| Release | June 15 2020 | November 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #283 | #278 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 5600M and GeForce GTX 780 Ti
