Radeon Pro 560X
VS
GRID T4-2Q

Radeon Pro 560X vs GRID T4-2Q

AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

2018Core: 1004 MHz
VS

GRID T4-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-2Q

#96
L4
MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800
100%
#97
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500
97%
#98
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000
96%
#99
Tesla M40
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099
94%
#100
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
87%
#101
84%
#102
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500
74%
#216
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
3404%
#231
GRID T4-2Q
MSRP: $845|Avg: $600
100%
#238
FirePro 3D V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
84%
#240
Quadro K600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
84%
#241
FirePro S7000
MSRP: $1249|Avg: $40
83%
#242
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
83%
#243
FirePro V7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $100
81%
#244
Quadro P500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
76%
#246
FireStream 9370
MSRP: $800|Avg: $50
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro 560X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 560X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID T4-2Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 560X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID T4-2Q.

InsightRadeon Pro 560XGRID T4-2Q
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 560X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 560X and GRID T4-2Q

AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

NVIDIA

GRID T4-2Q

The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 560X scores 3,678 and the GRID T4-2Q reaches 3,668 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID T4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q). Raw compute: 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XGRID T4-2Q
G3D Mark Score
3,678
3,668
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.056 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+135%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
64
128+100%
L1 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XGRID T4-2Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 2 MB (GRID T4-2Q) — the GRID T4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XGRID T4-2Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 12 Ultimate (GRID T4-2Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XGRID T4-2Q
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GRID T4-2Q). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GRID T4-2Q).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XGRID T4-2Q
Encoder
VCE 3.0
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
UVD 6.3
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 560X draws 75W versus the GRID T4-2Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 350W (GRID T4-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XGRID T4-2Q
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75
70-7%
Perf/Watt
49.0+201%
16.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GRID T4-2Q launched at $845 and now averages $600. The Radeon Pro 560X costs 100+% less ($600 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 6.1 (GRID T4-2Q) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro 560X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XGRID T4-2Q
MSRP
$0-100%
$845
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$600
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
6.1
Codename
Polaris 21
GM204
Release
July 16 2018
August 30 2015
Ranking
#528
#433