Radeon Pro 560X
VS
FirePro S7150

Radeon Pro 560X vs FirePro S7150

AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

2018Core: 1004 MHz
VS

FirePro S7150

2016Core: 920 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7150

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
100%
#299
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9410%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
100%
#316
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
98%
#317
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
97%
#318
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
97%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
97%
#320
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
96%
#321
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
94%
#322
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
90%
#323
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
90%
#324
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
89%
#325
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
88%
#326
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
87%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
87%
#328
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
85%
#329
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro 560X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 560X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S7150 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro S7150 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 560X.

InsightRadeon Pro 560XFirePro S7150
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)
Leading raw performance (+2.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro S7150 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 560X and FirePro S7150

AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

AMD

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 560X scores 3,678 and the FirePro S7150 reaches 3,770 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro S7150 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 2,048 (FirePro S7150). Raw compute: 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XFirePro S7150
G3D Mark Score
3,678
3,770+3%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.056 TFLOPS
3.768 TFLOPS+83%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
64
128+100%
L1 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XFirePro S7150
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 560X comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S7150 has 4 GB. The FirePro S7150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) — the Radeon Pro 560X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XFirePro S7150
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 12 (FirePro S7150). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XFirePro S7150
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X) vs H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XFirePro S7150
Encoder
VCE 3.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 6.3
UVD 5.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 560X draws 75W versus the FirePro S7150's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 350W (FirePro S7150). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XFirePro S7150
TDP
75W-50%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
241mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
49.0+95%
25.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 and now averages $459. The Radeon Pro 560X costs 100+% less ($459 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 8.2 (FirePro S7150) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro 560X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XFirePro S7150
MSRP
$0-100%
$2399
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$459
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
8.2
Codename
Polaris 21
Tonga
Release
July 16 2018
February 1 2016
Ranking
#528
#521