Radeon Pro 560X vs T400

AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

2018Core: 1004 MHz
VS

T400

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz

Radeon Pro 560X vs T400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 560X vs T400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 560X

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

T400

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Radeon Pro 560X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so T400 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 560X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (3,678 vs 3,609), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro 560X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro 560X vs T400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

T400

The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 560X scores 3,678 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the T400 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XT400
G3D Mark Score
3,678+2%
3,609
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Turing
Process Node
14 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1024+167%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.056 TFLOPS+88%
1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
64+167%
24
L1 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XT400
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 560X has 2 GB of VRAM, while the T400 carries 4 GB. T400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560X and 64-bit on the T400.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XT400
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 560X draws 75W versus the T400's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XT400
TDP
75W
30W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
49.0
120.3+146%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 560X came in at $0, while the T400 launched at $180. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 560X was 100+% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 20.1 (T400) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is T400 (2021 vs 2018).

FeatureRadeon Pro 560XT400
MSRP
$0-100%
$180
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
20.1
Codename
Polaris 21
TU117
Release
July 16 2018
May 6 2021
Ranking
#528
#532

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.