Radeon Pro 560X vs T400
Radeon Pro 560X
Popular choices:
T400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar T400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 560X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the T400 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 560X | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 560X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 560X and T400
Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 560X scores 3,678 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the T400 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,678+2% | 3,609 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.056 TFLOPS+88% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 560X comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the T400 has 4 GB. The T400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 560X draws 75W versus the T400's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 49.0 | 120.3+146% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the T400 launched at $180 and now averages $179. The Radeon Pro 560X costs 100+% less ($179 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 20.2 (T400) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $180 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $179 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 20.2 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | TU117 |
| Release | July 16 2018 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #528 | #532 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 560X and T400
