Radeon Pro 560X vs T400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro 560X vs T400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon Pro 560X vs T400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Radeon Pro 560X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so T400 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 560X vs T400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 560X scores 3,678 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the T400 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,678+2% | 3,609 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.056 TFLOPS+88% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 560X has 2 GB of VRAM, while the T400 carries 4 GB. T400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560X and 64-bit on the T400.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 560X draws 75W versus the T400's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 49.0 | 120.3+146% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro 560X came in at $0, while the T400 launched at $180. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 560X was 100+% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 20.1 (T400) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is T400 (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 20.1 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | TU117 |
| Release | July 16 2018 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #528 | #532 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















