G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7150 vs Radeon Pro 560X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro S7150 vs Radeon Pro 560X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7150

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro 560X

2018

Why buy it

✅FirePro S7150 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 560X is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro S7150 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (3,770 vs 3,678), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 560X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro S7150 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro S7150 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 560X has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro S7150 vs Radeon Pro 560X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Radeon Pro 560X

The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X).

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon Pro 560X
G3D Mark Score	3,770+3%	3,678
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+100%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.768 TFLOPS+83%	2.056 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon Pro 560X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 560X carries 2 GB. FirePro S7150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7150 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560X. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560X) — the Radeon Pro 560X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon Pro 560X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon Pro 560X
DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X).

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon Pro 560X
Encoder	VCE 3.0	VCE 3.0
Decoder	UVD 5.0	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon Pro 560X
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75
Perf/Watt	25.1	49.0+95%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7150 came in at $2399, while the Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 560X was 100+% cheaper ($2399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 560X (2018 vs 2016).

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon Pro 560X
MSRP	$2399	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	Infinity
Codename	Tonga	Polaris 21
Release	February 1 2016	July 16 2018
Ranking	#521	#528

Search FirePro S7150 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 560X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.