
GRID T4-2Q

Radeon Pro 560X
GRID T4-2Q vs Radeon Pro 560X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID T4-2Q vs Radeon Pro 560X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID T4-2Q vs Radeon Pro 560X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID T4-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($845 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Radeon Pro 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅GRID T4-2Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 560X is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID T4-2Q vs Radeon Pro 560X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID T4-2Q
The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.

Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID T4-2Q scores 3,668 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q) vs 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X).
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,668 | 3,678 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+135% | 2.056 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-2Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID T4-2Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560X) — the GRID T4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GRID T4-2Q) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GRID T4-2Q) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GRID T4-2Q) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X).
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID T4-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75.
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.3 | 49.0+201% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID T4-2Q came in at $845, while the Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 560X was 100+% cheaper ($845 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.3 (GRID T4-2Q) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 560X (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $845 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | July 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #433 | #528 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














