GeForce MX450 vs GRID T4-2Q

NVIDIA

GeForce MX450

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

GRID T4-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
··

GeForce MX450 vs GRID T4-2Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX450 vs GRID T4-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX450

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $595 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
  • Delivers 242.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
  • GRID T4-2Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX450 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 25W instead of 225W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

GRID T4-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 238% HIGHER MSRP
    $845 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($845 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • 800% higher power demand at 225W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce MX450 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (3,720 vs 3,668), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce MX450 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX450 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $595 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $845, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 242.8% (14.9 vs 4.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce MX450 vs GRID T4-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX450

The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

NVIDIA

GRID T4-2Q

The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the GRID T4-2Q reaches 3,668 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the GRID T4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX450GRID T4-2Q
G3D Mark Score
3,720+1%
3,668
Architecture
Turing
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
896
2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+50%
Boost Clock
1575 MHz+34%
1178 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
64
128+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX450 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID T4-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce MX450GRID T4-2Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX450 and 64-bit on the GRID T4-2Q.

FeatureGeForce MX450GRID T4-2Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the GRID T4-2Q's 225W — a 160% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (GRID T4-2Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce MX450GRID T4-2Q
TDP
25W-89%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
148.8+813%
16.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX450 came in at $250, while the GRID T4-2Q launched at $845. On MSRP, GeForce MX450 was 70.4% cheaper ($595 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 4.3 (GRID T4-2Q) — the GeForce MX450 offers 246.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX450 (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce MX450GRID T4-2Q
MSRP
$250-70%
$845
Performance per Dollar
14.9+247%
4.3
Codename
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
GM204
Release
August 1 2020
August 30 2015
Ranking
#523
#433

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.