
GeForce MX450

GRID T4-2Q
GeForce MX450 vs GRID T4-2Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX450 vs GRID T4-2Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce MX450 vs GRID T4-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $595 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 242.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
- ✅GRID T4-2Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX450 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 225W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
GRID T4-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌238% HIGHER MSRP$845 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($845 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌800% higher power demand at 225W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX450 vs GRID T4-2Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

GRID T4-2Q
The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the GRID T4-2Q reaches 3,668 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the GRID T4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720+1% | 3,668 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+50% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz+34% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX450 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID T4-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX450 and 64-bit on the GRID T4-2Q.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the GRID T4-2Q's 225W — a 160% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (GRID T4-2Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+813% | 16.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX450 came in at $250, while the GRID T4-2Q launched at $845. On MSRP, GeForce MX450 was 70.4% cheaper ($595 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 4.3 (GRID T4-2Q) — the GeForce MX450 offers 246.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX450 (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-70% | $845 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9+247% | 4.3 |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GM204 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #523 | #433 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














