
GRID T4-2Q

Quadro P620
GRID T4-2Q vs Quadro P620 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID T4-2Q vs Quadro P620 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID T4-2Q vs Quadro P620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID T4-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌397.1% HIGHER MSRP$845 MSRPvs$170 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($845 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ❌462.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 40W.
- ❌15.9% longer card at 168mm vs 145mm.
Quadro P620
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $675 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 401.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
- ✅GRID T4-2Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P620 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 225W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 168mm, a 23mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID T4-2Q vs Quadro P620 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID T4-2Q
The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.

Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID T4-2Q scores 3,668 and the Quadro P620 reaches 3,698 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1443 MHz.
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,668 | 3,698 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+226% | 1.478 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1443 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+300% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-2Q and 64-bit on the Quadro P620. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID T4-2Q) vs 1 MB (Quadro P620) — the GRID T4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GRID T4-2Q) vs 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (FL12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GRID T4-2Q) vs NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GRID T4-2Q) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620).
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID T4-2Q draws 225W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-2Q) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 40W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 145mm |
| Height | 69mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.3 | 92.5+467% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID T4-2Q came in at $845, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170. On MSRP, Quadro P620 was 79.9% cheaper ($675 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.3 (GRID T4-2Q) vs 21.8 (Quadro P620) — the Quadro P620 offers 407% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P620 (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $845 | $170-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.3 | 21.8+407% |
| Codename | GM204 | GP107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #433 | #524 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














