
GRID T4-2Q

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
GRID T4-2Q vs Radeon RX 550X (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID T4-2Q vs Radeon RX 550X (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID T4-2Q vs Radeon RX 550X (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID T4-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2314.3% HIGHER MSRP$845 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 108.6 G3D/$ ($845 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
- ❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $810 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2401.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 108.6 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅GRID T4-2Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550X (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID T4-2Q vs Radeon RX 550X (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID T4-2Q
The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 550X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1287 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID T4-2Q scores 3,668 and the Radeon RX 550X (móvel) reaches 3,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 550X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q) vs 640 (Radeon RX 550X (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q) vs 1.647 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1287 MHz.
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,668 | 3,800+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+193% | 1.647 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1287 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+380% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550X (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID T4-2Q does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID T4-2Q and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 550X (móvel). L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID T4-2Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550X (móvel)) — the GRID T4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID T4-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 550X (móvel)'s 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon RX 550X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 550X (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.3 | 76.0+366% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID T4-2Q came in at $845, while the Radeon RX 550X (móvel) launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550X (móvel) was 95.9% cheaper ($810 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.3 (GRID T4-2Q) vs 108.6 (Radeon RX 550X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 550X (móvel) offers 2425.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550X (móvel) (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID T4-2Q | Radeon RX 550X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $845 | $35-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.3 | 108.6+2426% |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #433 | #648 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














