G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7150 vs GRID T4-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro S7150 vs GRID T4-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7150

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
183.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,399 MSRPvs$845 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
❌43.5% longer card at 241mm vs 168mm.

GRID T4-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,554 less on MSRP ($845 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 176.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($845 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
✅Measures 168mm instead of 241mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro S7150 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (3,770 vs 3,668), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro S7150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID T4-2Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,554 cheaper on MSRP at $845 vs $2,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 176.2% (4.3 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID T4-2Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro S7150 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro S7150 vs GRID T4-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

GRID T4-2Q

The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the GRID T4-2Q reaches 3,668 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GRID T4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q).

Feature	FirePro S7150	GRID T4-2Q
G3D Mark Score	3,770+3%	3,668
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.768 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+28%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	128	128
L1 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro S7150	GRID T4-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID T4-2Q carries 2 GB. FirePro S7150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7150 and 64-bit on the GRID T4-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 2 MB (GRID T4-2Q) — the GRID T4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro S7150	GRID T4-2Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12 Ultimate (GRID T4-2Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	FirePro S7150	GRID T4-2Q
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GRID T4-2Q). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GRID T4-2Q).

Feature	FirePro S7150	GRID T4-2Q
Encoder	VCE 3.0	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	UVD 5.0	NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the GRID T4-2Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro S7150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (GRID T4-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70.

Feature	FirePro S7150	GRID T4-2Q
TDP	150W-33%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	70°C	70
Perf/Watt	25.1+54%	16.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7150 came in at $2399, while the GRID T4-2Q launched at $845. On MSRP, GRID T4-2Q was 64.8% cheaper ($1554 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs 4.3 (GRID T4-2Q) — the GRID T4-2Q offers 168.7% better value. The newer card here is FirePro S7150 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	FirePro S7150	GRID T4-2Q
MSRP	$2399	$845-65%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	4.3+169%
Codename	Tonga	GM204
Release	February 1 2016	August 30 2015
Ranking	#521	#433

Search FirePro S7150 on Amazon

Search GRID T4-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.