GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon Pro 560X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

2012Core: 720 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

2018Core: 1004 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon Pro 560X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon Pro 560X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon Pro 560X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680MX

2012

Why buy it

  • 3.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro 560X

2018

Why buy it

  • GeForce GTX 680MX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 560X is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 680MX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (3,799 vs 3,678), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 560X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 680MX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 680MX is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 560X has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon Pro 560X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon Pro 560X
G3D Mark Score
3,799+3%
3,678
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536+50%
1024

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 560X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon Pro 560X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680MX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 560X carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 680MX gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680MX and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560X.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon Pro 560X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon Pro 560X
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon Pro 560X
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Kepler)
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 47.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon Pro 560X
TDP
122W
75W-39%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80
75-6%
Perf/Watt
31.1
49.0+58%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 560X (2018 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon Pro 560X
MSRP
$0
Codename
Polaris 21
Release
October 23 2012
July 16 2018
Ranking
#520
#528

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.