Radeon Pro 560X vs GeForce MX450
Radeon Pro 560X
Popular choices:
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 560X.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX450 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 560X and GeForce MX450
Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 560X scores 3,678 and the GeForce MX450 reaches 3,720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce MX450 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 896 (GeForce MX450). Raw compute: 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,678 | 3,720+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+14% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.056 TFLOPS | 3.226 TFLOPS+57% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 560X draws 75W versus the GeForce MX450's 25W — a 100% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 350W (GeForce MX450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 25W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 49.0 | 148.8+204% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce MX450 launched at $250 and now averages $200. The Radeon Pro 560X costs 100+% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 18.6 (GeForce MX450) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce MX450 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 18.6 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | July 16 2018 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #528 | #523 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 560X and GeForce MX450
