Radeon Pro 5700 vs GeForce GTX 1660

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

126%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

125%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

123%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

122%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

118%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

116%

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

106%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

105%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

103%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

101%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

100%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

98%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

95%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

92%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

89%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

88%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

87%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

86%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

84%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

82%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

76%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

72%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1660 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Pro 5700	GeForce GTX 1660
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)	🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1660 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $250 for the Radeon Pro 5700, it costs 28% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 40.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro 5700	GeForce GTX 1660
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+40.9%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)	✅More affordable ($180)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 5700 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1660 Benchmark Check

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 and GeForce GTX 1660

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

GeForce GTX 1660

The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 and the GeForce GTX 1660 reaches 11,639 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1660 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	GeForce GTX 1660
G3D Mark Score	11,469	11,639+1%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Process Node	7 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304+64%	1408
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.221 TFLOPS+24%	5.027 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1350 MHz	1785 MHz+32%
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	144+64%	88
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	GeForce GTX 1660
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 5700 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 has 6 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	GeForce GTX 1660
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+33%	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	GeForce GTX 1660
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660).

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	GeForce GTX 1660
Encoder	VCN 2.0	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	VCN 2.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the GeForce GTX 1660's 120W — a 8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	GeForce GTX 1660
TDP	130W	120W-8%
Recommended PSU	500W	450W-10%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	267mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	88.2	97.0+10%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219 and now averages $180. The GeForce GTX 1660 costs 28% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.9 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 64.7 (GeForce GTX 1660) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 41% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).