Radeon Pro 5700 vs Quadro P5200
Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $240 versus $250 for the Radeon Pro 5700, it costs 4% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 5.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($240) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 and Quadro P5200
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1746 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,469 | 11,650+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.221 TFLOPS | 8.94 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1746 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5200) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 100W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 116.5+32% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500 and now averages $240. The Quadro P5200 costs 4% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.9 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 48.5 (Quadro P5200) — the Quadro P5200 offers 5.7% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $500-37% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $240-4% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.9 | 48.5+6% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GP104 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #238 | #230 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 5700 and Quadro P5200
