Radeon Pro 5700 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 97.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5700.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-97.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+97.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $250), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 29.9% better value per dollar than the Radeon Pro 5700.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+29.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($250) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 97.5%. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,469 | 22,651+97% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4352+89% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.221 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+255% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 2535 MHz+88% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+6% | 136 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 20.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-19% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 141.6+61% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $380. The Radeon Pro 5700 costs 34.2% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.9 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 29.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $399-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250-34% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.9 | 59.6+30% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | AD106 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #238 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 5700 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
