
Radeon Pro 5700

Radeon RX 5600
Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon RX 5600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon RX 5600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon RX 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅10.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 150W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 5600 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌248.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 51.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon RX 5600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 257.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon RX 5600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

Radeon RX 5600
The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 and the Radeon RX 5600 reaches 11,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,469 | 11,753+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.221 TFLOPS+7% | 5.829 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz+7% | 1265 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5600 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro 5700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 carries 6 GB. Radeon Pro 5700 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5700 and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 5600. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 5600's 150W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-13% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+12% | 78.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro 5700 came in at $799, while the Radeon RX 5600 launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5600 was 71.3% cheaper ($570 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 51.3 (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon RX 5600 offers 256.3% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $229-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.4 | 51.3+256% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | July 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #238 | #295 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














