Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon RX 5600

AMD

Radeon Pro 5700

2020Core: 1243 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 5600

2020Core: 1035 MHzBoost: 1265 MHz
RX family
·······

Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon RX 5600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon RX 5600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon RX 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

Why buy it

  • 10.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
  • Draws 130W instead of 150W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Radeon RX 5600 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 248.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $799 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 51.3 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
  • 10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Radeon RX 5600

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $570 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 257.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 15.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 5700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 5600 instead at 11,753 vs 11,469, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 5600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon Pro 5700 has no comparable frame-generation support. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 5600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $570 cheaper on MSRP at $229 vs $799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 257.5% (51.3 vs 14.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro 5700 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon Pro 5700 vs Radeon RX 5600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 5600

The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 and the Radeon RX 5600 reaches 11,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 5600 uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1265 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon RX 5600
G3D Mark Score
11,469
11,753+2%
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
7 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
2304
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.221 TFLOPS+7%
5.829 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1350 MHz+7%
1265 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
144
144
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5600 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro 5700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon RX 5600
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 5700 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 carries 6 GB. Radeon Pro 5700 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5700 and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 5600. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon RX 5600
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+33%
6 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon RX 5600
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600).

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon RX 5600
Encoder
VCN 2.0
VCN 2.0
Decoder
VCN 2.0
VCN 2.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 5600's 150W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon RX 5600
TDP
130W-13%
150W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
241mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
88.2+12%
78.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro 5700 came in at $799, while the Radeon RX 5600 launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5600 was 71.3% cheaper ($570 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 51.3 (Radeon RX 5600) — the Radeon RX 5600 offers 256.3% better value.

FeatureRadeon Pro 5700Radeon RX 5600
MSRP
$799
$229-71%
Performance per Dollar
14.4
51.3+256%
Codename
Navi 10
Navi 10
Release
August 4 2020
July 7 2020
Ranking
#238
#295

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.