Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro 5700

CPU

GPU

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

2021Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1410 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro 5700

2020Core: 1243 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro 5700 Performance Spectrum

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

8 GB 40

11,715

+2.1%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

Radeon Pro 5700

8 GB 130

11,469

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro 5700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro 5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 130W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

Why buy it

✅21.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌225% higher power demand at 130W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 5700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) instead at 11,715 vs 11,469, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon Pro 5700 has no comparable frame-generation support and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 5700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 5700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro 5700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,715 points.

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) scores 11,715 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 2.527 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1410 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5700
G3D Mark Score	11,715+2%	11,469
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	896	2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.527 TFLOPS	6.221 TFLOPS+146%
Boost Clock	1410 MHz+4%	1350 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	144+157%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro 5700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5700. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5700
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5700
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 105.9% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5700
TDP	40W-69%	130W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	292.9+232%	88.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) (2021 vs 2020).

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP	—	$799
Codename	TU117	Navi 10
Release	April 12 2021	August 4 2020
Ranking	#354	#238

Search Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 5700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.