Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700 XT

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

125%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

123%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

123%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

122%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

120%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

111%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

110%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

110%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

101%

#27

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

MSRP: $500|Avg: $280

100%

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

94%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

93%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

92%

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

88%

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

86%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

75%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

73%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

72%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 58.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (16 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	Radeon Pro 5700 XT	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+58.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-58.1%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (16 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $280 for the Radeon Pro 5700 XT, it costs 73% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 136.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro 5700 XT	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+136.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 XT and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro 5700 XT scores 12,442 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT leads by 58.1%. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1499 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700 XT	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	12,442+58%	7,869
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Process Node	7 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2560+186%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.675 TFLOPS+157%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1499 MHz	1665 MHz+11%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+186%	56
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700 XT	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700 XT	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700 XT	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+100%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder 7.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700 XT	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	RDNA 1.0	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	Unified Video Decoder 7.0	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT draws 130W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700 XT	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	130W	75W-42%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	95.7	104.9+10%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 73.2% less ($205 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 136.3% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).