CPU
GPU
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $280 for the Radeon Pro 5700 XT, it costs 46% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 78.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+78.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 XT and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT scores 12,442 and the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM reaches 11,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1499 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,442+5% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.675 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1499 MHz | 1755 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 1.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 0% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.7+5% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 46.4% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 78.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $249-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280 | $150-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4 | 79.3+79% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GA106 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #215 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 5700 XT and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
