CPU
GPU
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B50
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro B50.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $349 for the Intel Arc Pro B50, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 27% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+27%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($280) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($349) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Intel Arc Pro B50
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT scores 12,442 and the Intel Arc Pro B50 reaches 12,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 1499 MHz vs 2600 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,442+2% | 12,208 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.675 TFLOPS | 10.65 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 1499 MHz | 2600 MHz+73% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder 7.0 vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 1.0 | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT draws 130W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 60% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 70W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 167mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 95.7 | 174.4+82% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349 and now averages $349. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT costs 19.8% less ($69 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 44.4 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 26.9% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 XT | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $349-30% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280-20% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+27% | 35.0 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | August 4 2020 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #215 | #221 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 5700 XT and Intel Arc Pro B50
