Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU vs Quadro P6000
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 36.5% more VRAM (32 GB vs 23 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P6000.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / RDNA 2.0) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+36.5%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Quadro P6000
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the Quadro P6000 reaches 15,512 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,633 | 15,512 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2 | 3840+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 | 12.63 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1645 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 224 ×2 | 240+7% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.4 MB+59% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 36.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+37% | 23.438 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro P6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 250W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1 | 62.0+19% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1500 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GP102 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #592 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Quadro P6000
