Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 102% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-102%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+102%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / RDNA 2.0) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 102%. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,633 | 31,578+102% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2 | 7680+114% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 | 40.09 TFLOPS+273% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2610 MHz+74% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 224 ×2 | 240+7% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 7.5 MB+752% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+167% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 5.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 285W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-7% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1 | 110.8+113% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $590 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | AD104 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #592 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
