Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU vs Arc B580
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Arc B580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Performance Per Dollar Arc B580
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc B580 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The Arc B580 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc B580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / RDNA 2.0) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 Battlemage / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (272mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc B580 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Arc B580
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
Arc B580
The Arc B580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 13 2024. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2670 MHz to 2670 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,977 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the Arc B580 reaches 15,977 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Arc B580 uses Xe2, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 2,560 (Arc B580). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 13.67 TFLOPS (Arc B580). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2670 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,633 | 15,977+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 | 13.67 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2670 MHz+78% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+40% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 5 MB+468% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 18 MB+350% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Arc B580 has 12 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 18 MB (Arc B580) — the Arc B580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+167% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 18 MB+350% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc B580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs Xe2 Media Engine (Arc B580). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs Xe2 Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Arc B580).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | Xe2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | Xe2 Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Arc B580's 190W — a 44.9% difference. The Arc B580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 600W (Arc B580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 272mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 190W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 272mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1 | 84.1+61% |
Value Analysis
The Arc B580 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Arc B580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $249 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | December 13 2024 |
| Ranking | #592 | #132 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Arc B580
