Radeon Pro Vega 16
VS
FirePro S9050

Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs FirePro S9050

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018Core: 815 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz
VS

FirePro S9050

2014Core: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9050

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
96%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
95%
#110
Quadro GV100
MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999
86%
#256
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6030%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
100%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
98%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
97%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
96%
#278
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
95%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
92%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
90%
#281
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
90%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
87%
#286
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S9050 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro S9050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 16.

InsightRadeon Pro Vega 16FirePro S9050
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (254mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro S9050 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and FirePro S9050

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 16

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

AMD

FirePro S9050

The FirePro S9050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,901 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 4,809 and the FirePro S9050 reaches 4,901 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is built on GCN 5.0 while the FirePro S9050 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 1,792 (FirePro S9050). Raw compute: 2.437 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9050).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16FirePro S9050
G3D Mark Score
4,809
4,901+2%
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
1792+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.437 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS+32%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
112+75%
L1 Cache
256 KB
448 KB+75%
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16FirePro S9050
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro S9050 has 4 GB. The FirePro S9050 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro S9050) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16FirePro S9050
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 12 (FirePro S9050). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16FirePro S9050
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro S9050). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S9050).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16FirePro S9050
Encoder
VCE 4.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 7.0
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 draws 75W versus the FirePro S9050's 225W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 350W (FirePro S9050). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 254mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 90°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16FirePro S9050
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
254mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80-11%
90°C
Perf/Watt
64.1+194%
21.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro S9050 launched at $1999 and now averages $1825. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 costs 100+% less ($1825 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 2.7 (FirePro S9050) — the Radeon Pro Vega 16 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 16FirePro S9050
MSRP
$0-100%
$1999
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$1825
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
2.7
Codename
Vega 12
Tahiti
Release
November 14 2018
August 7 2014
Ranking
#451
#446