Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is significantly newer (2018 vs 0). The Radeon Pro Vega 16 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 460 768MB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Pro Vega 16	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))	Fermi (2010−2014) (Standard Node)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Vega 16 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro Vega 16 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 460 768MB Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 16 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Radeon Pro Vega 16

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 4,809 and the GeForce GTX 460 768MB reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB uses Fermi. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
G3D Mark Score	4,809	4,800
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Fermi
Shading Units	1024+205%	336

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	192-bit+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 16	GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Encoder	VCE 4.0	PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder	UVD 7.0	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 460 768MB's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.