Radeon Pro Vega II vs Quadro P6000
Radeon Pro Vega II
Popular choices:
Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega II
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro Vega II uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro Vega II likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega II is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega II | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P6000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,500 versus $1,800 for the Radeon Pro Vega II, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 19.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega II | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+19.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,800) | ✅More affordable ($1,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega II and Quadro P6000
Radeon Pro Vega II
The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega II scores 15,597 and the Quadro P6000 reaches 15,512 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega II is built on GCN 5.1 while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,597 | 15,512 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+7% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.09 TFLOPS+12% | 12.63 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz+5% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+7% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.4 MB+40% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega II comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Radeon Pro Vega II has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 23.438 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+100% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega II draws 475W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 62.1% difference. The Quadro P6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 4 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 475W | 250W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 120mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 4 | 2-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.8 | 62.0+89% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega II launched at $2199 MSRP and currently averages $1800, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999 and now averages $1500. The Quadro P6000 costs 16.7% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.7 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 10.3 (Quadro P6000) — the Quadro P6000 offers 18.4% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega II is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2199-63% | $5999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1800 | $1500-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.7 | 10.3+18% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | GP102 |
| Release | June 3 2019 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #138 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega II and Quadro P6000
