
Radeon Pro Vega II vs Radeon RX 7800M

Radeon Pro Vega II
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7800M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega II
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7800M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7800M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega II.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 7800M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega II and Radeon RX 7800M

Radeon Pro Vega II
The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.

Radeon RX 7800M
The Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,984 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega II scores 15,597 and the Radeon RX 7800M reaches 15,984 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega II is built on GCN 5.1 while the Radeon RX 7800M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 7800M). Raw compute: 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7800M). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 2335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,597 | 15,984+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+7% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.09 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+155% |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz | 2335 MHz+36% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+7% | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega II lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega II comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7800M has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 7800M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7800M) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+100% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7800M). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7800M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega II draws 475W versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 180W — a 90.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7800M). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 4 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 475W | 180W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 120mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 4 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.8 | 88.8+171% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7800M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1800 | — |
| Codename | Vega 20 | Navi 32 |
| Release | June 3 2019 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #138 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















