
Radeon Pro Vega II

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Radeon Pro Vega II vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro Vega II vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro Vega II vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro Vega II
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌313% higher power demand at 475W vs 115W.
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅40.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 475W, a 360W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro Vega II vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro Vega II
The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,848 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega II scores 15,597 and the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 15,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega II is built on GCN 5.1 while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 4,608 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 15.62 TFLOPS (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,597 | 15,848+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 4608+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.09 TFLOPS | 15.62 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz | 2000 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 256+78% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 4.5 MB+350% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega II leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega II has 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU carries 8 GB. RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 237.5% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega II and 128-bit on the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 32 MB (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+238% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 12.2 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega II draws 475W versus the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 115W — a 122% difference. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 650W (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 4 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 475W | 115W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 120mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 4 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 32.8 | 137.8+320% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2199 | — |
| Codename | Vega 20 | AD106 |
| Release | June 3 2019 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #138 | #134 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















