Radeon Pro Vega II vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Radeon Pro Vega II
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega II
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega II is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 24.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega II | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+24.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-24.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $1,800 for the Radeon Pro Vega II, it costs 88% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 592.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega II | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+592.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,800) | ✅More affordable ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega II and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Radeon Pro Vega II
The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro Vega II scores 15,597 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the Radeon Pro Vega II leads by 24.4%. The Radeon Pro Vega II is built on GCN 5.1 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,597+24% | 12,535 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+60% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.09 TFLOPS+55% | 9.098 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz | 1777 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+220% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2.5 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega II comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 285.7% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the Radeon Pro Vega II has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 864 GB/s+286% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega II draws 475W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 114% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 4 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 475W | 130W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 120mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 4 | 2-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 66°C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 32.8 | 96.4+194% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega II launched at $2199 MSRP and currently averages $1800, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 88.4% less ($1591 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.7 (Radeon Pro Vega II) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 589.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega II | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2199 | $249-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1800 | $209-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.7 | 60.0+590% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | GA106 |
| Release | June 3 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #138 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega II and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
