
Radeon Pro VII vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon Pro VII
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro VII
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro VII is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 68.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (16 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | Radeon Pro VII | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+68.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-68.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Vega 20 / 7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (305mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $1,400 for the Radeon Pro VII, it costs 95% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 1007.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro VII | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1007.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,400) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro VII and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon Pro VII
The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro VII scores 13,264 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Radeon Pro VII leads by 68.6%. The Radeon Pro VII is built on GCN 5.1 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,264+69% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+329% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.06 TFLOPS+338% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz+2% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+329% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+7% | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro VII comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro VII offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro VII) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon Pro VII has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 7.2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.1 | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.2 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro VII draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro VII) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 305mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 305mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.1 | 104.9+98% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro VII launched at $1899 MSRP and currently averages $1400, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 94.6% less ($1325 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.5 (Radeon Pro VII) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1004.2% better value. The Radeon Pro VII is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro VII | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1899 | $149-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1400 | $75-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.5 | 104.9+1004% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | TU117 |
| Release | May 13 2020 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #194 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















