CPU
GPU
Radeon Pro
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 496.5% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro.
| Insight | Radeon Pro | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-496.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+496.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $99), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 392.1% better value per dollar than the Radeon Pro.
| Insight | Radeon Pro | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+392.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($99) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro and GeForce RTX 2060
Radeon Pro
The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro scores 2,366 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 496.5%. The Radeon Pro is built on GCN 5.1 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,366 | 14,114+497% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+100% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.06 TFLOPS+102% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz+1% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 240+100% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.9 MB+102% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Unified Video Decoder (Radeon Pro) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder vs NVDEC (Turing).
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Unified Video Decoder | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | Unified Video Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 160W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 229mm |
| Height | — | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.5 | 88.2+828% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The Radeon Pro costs 17.5% less ($21 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.9 (Radeon Pro) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 392.1% better value. The Radeon Pro is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $99-18% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.9 | 117.6+392% |
| Codename | Vega 20 | TU106 |
| Release | May 13 2020 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #194 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro and GeForce RTX 2060
