Radeon Pro vs P106-090

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar P106-090

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

99%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

97%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

96%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

95%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

92%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

88%

#168

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2330%

#183

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

100%

#184

P106-090

MSRP: $389|Avg: $30

100%

#185

Radeon Pro WX 4130

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

99%

#187

Tesla M6

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84

98%

#189

CMP 30HX

MSRP: $799|Avg: $60

97%

#190

FirePro W2100

MSRP: $139|Avg: $30

97%

#192

FirePro M6000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

96%

#195

FirePro M4170

MSRP: $200|Avg: $80

92%

#196

GRID K140Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $500

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P106-090 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The P106-090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro.

Insight	Radeon Pro	P106-090
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%)
Longevity	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (250mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The P106-090 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $99 for the Radeon Pro, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 243.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro	P106-090
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+243.9%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro Benchmark Check

P106-090 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro and P106-090

Radeon Pro

The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.

P106-090

The P106-090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 31 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,466 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro scores 2,366 and the P106-090 reaches 2,466 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro is built on GCN 5.1 while the P106-090 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro) vs 768 (P106-090). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro) vs 2.352 TFLOPS (P106-090). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1531 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro	P106-090
G3D Mark Score	2,366	2,466+4%
Architecture	GCN 5.1	Pascal
Process Node	7 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	3840+400%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	13.06 TFLOPS+455%	2.352 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1700 MHz+11%	1531 MHz
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	240+400%	48
L1 Cache	960 KB+233%	288 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro	P106-090
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro) vs 1.5 MB (P106-090) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro	P106-090
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro) vs 12 (P106-090). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon Pro	P106-090
DirectX	12_0	12
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Unified Video Decoder (Radeon Pro) vs NVENC (Pascal) (P106-090). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder vs NVDEC.

Feature	Radeon Pro	P106-090
Encoder	Unified Video Decoder	NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	Unified Video Decoder	NVDEC
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro draws 250W versus the P106-090's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The P106-090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro) vs 350W (P106-090). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 250mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon Pro	P106-090
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	250mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	—	60°C
Perf/Watt	9.5	32.9+246%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the P106-090 launched at $389 and now averages $30. The P106-090 costs 69.7% less ($69 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.9 (Radeon Pro) vs 82.2 (P106-090) — the P106-090 offers 243.9% better value. The Radeon Pro is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).