Radeon Pro vs GeForce MX250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX250

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

98%

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

95%

#281

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

686%

#283

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

622%

#284

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

620%

#288

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

564%

#289

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

560%

#291

GeForce MX250

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#292

Radeon 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#293

GeForce MX330

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

99%

#296

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

97%

#300

GeForce 940MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#301

GeForce MX130

MSRP: $120|Avg: $50

95%

#302

Arc Graphics 130V

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

95%

#303

Radeon R5 430

MSRP: $59|Avg: $50

95%

#304

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro.

Insight	Radeon Pro	GeForce MX250
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm)	Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon Pro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $99 versus $150 for the GeForce MX250, it costs 34% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 50.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro	GeForce MX250
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+50.9%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($99)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro Benchmark Check

GeForce MX250 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro and GeForce MX250

Radeon Pro

The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.

GeForce MX250

The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro scores 2,366 and the GeForce MX250 reaches 2,375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro is built on GCN 5.1 while the GeForce MX250 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro) vs 384 (GeForce MX250). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX250). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1038 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro	GeForce MX250
G3D Mark Score	2,366	2,375
Architecture	GCN 5.1	Pascal
Process Node	7 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3840+900%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	13.06 TFLOPS+1538%	0.7972 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1700 MHz+64%	1038 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	240+900%	24
L1 Cache	960 KB+567%	144 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro	GeForce MX250
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX250) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro	GeForce MX250
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon Pro	GeForce MX250
DirectX	12_0	12 (12_1)
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Unified Video Decoder (Radeon Pro) vs None (GeForce MX250). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder vs NVDEC 3rd Gen.

Feature	Radeon Pro	GeForce MX250
Encoder	Unified Video Decoder	None
Decoder	Unified Video Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro draws 250W versus the GeForce MX250's 10W — a 184.6% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro) vs 350W (GeForce MX250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon Pro	GeForce MX250
TDP	250W	10W-96%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	241mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	9.5	237.5+2400%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the GeForce MX250 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro costs 34% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.9 (Radeon Pro) vs 15.8 (GeForce MX250) — the Radeon Pro offers 51.3% better value. The Radeon Pro is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).