
Radeon Pro
Popular choices:

GeForce MX330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX330
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | Radeon Pro | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $99 versus $100 for the GeForce MX330, it costs 1% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($99) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro and GeForce MX330

Radeon Pro
The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.

GeForce MX330
The GeForce MX330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1531 MHz to 1594 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,350 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro scores 2,366 and the GeForce MX330 reaches 2,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro is built on GCN 5.1 while the GeForce MX330 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro) vs 384 (GeForce MX330). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro) vs 1.224 TFLOPS (GeForce MX330). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1594 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,366 | 2,350 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+900% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.06 TFLOPS+967% | 1.224 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz+7% | 1594 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+900% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+567% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX330) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro) vs 12 (GeForce MX330). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Unified Video Decoder (Radeon Pro) vs Pascal (GeForce MX330). Decoder: Unified Video Decoder vs PureVideo HD VP8.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Unified Video Decoder | Pascal |
| Decoder | Unified Video Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro draws 250W versus the GeForce MX330's 10W — a 184.6% difference. The GeForce MX330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro) vs 350W (GeForce MX330). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 10W-96% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.5 | 235.0+2374% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the GeForce MX330 launched at $150 and now averages $100. The Radeon Pro costs 1% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.9 (Radeon Pro) vs 23.5 (GeForce MX330) — the Radeon Pro offers 1.7% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $99-1% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.9+2% | 23.5 |
| Codename | Vega 20 | GP108 |
| Release | May 13 2020 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #194 | #647 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















