Radeon Pro vs GRID M10-1Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M10-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro.

Insight	Radeon Pro	GRID M10-1Q
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon Pro offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $99 versus $500 for the GRID M10-1Q, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 401% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro	GRID M10-1Q
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+401%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($99)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro Benchmark Check

GRID M10-1Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro and GRID M10-1Q

Radeon Pro

The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.

GRID M10-1Q

The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro scores 2,366 and the GRID M10-1Q reaches 2,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro is built on GCN 5.1 while the GRID M10-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon Pro) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q). Raw compute: 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q). Boost clocks: 1700 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro	GRID M10-1Q
G3D Mark Score	2,366	2,385
Architecture	GCN 5.1	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3840+88%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	13.06 TFLOPS+171%	4.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1700 MHz+44%	1178 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	240+88%	128
L1 Cache	960 KB+25%	768 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro	GRID M10-1Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1Q) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro	GRID M10-1Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon Pro) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon Pro	GRID M10-1Q
DirectX	12_0	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro draws 250W versus the GRID M10-1Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID M10-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro) vs 350W (GRID M10-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon Pro	GRID M10-1Q
TDP	250W	225W-10%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	267mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Perf/Watt	9.5	10.6+12%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the GRID M10-1Q launched at $0 and now averages $500. The Radeon Pro costs 80.2% less ($401 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.9 (Radeon Pro) vs 4.8 (GRID M10-1Q) — the Radeon Pro offers 397.9% better value. The Radeon Pro is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).