Radeon Pro W5500M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro W5500M is positioned at rank 3 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is on rank 150, so the Radeon Pro W5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500M

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

128%

#3

Radeon Pro W5500M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

96%

#140

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

320%

#142

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

290%

#143

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

290%

#147

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

263%

#148

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

262%

#150

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#157

GeForce 830M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

99%

#158

GeForce GT 750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

98%

#159

GeForce GT 425M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro W5500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

Insight	Radeon Pro W5500M	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Longevity	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro W5500M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro W5500M Benchmark Check

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500M and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Radeon Pro W5500M

The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro W5500M scores 3,470 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 7 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500M	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score	3,470+2%	3,390
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node	7 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	1408+1367%	96

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500M	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro W5500M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500M	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500M	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500M	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Encoder	VCN 2.0	QuickSync
Decoder	VCN 2.0	QuickSync
Codecs	HEVC,H.264,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro W5500M draws 85W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 95.7% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.