Radeon Pro W5500M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro W5500M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro W5500M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro W5500M

2020

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌183.3% higher power demand at 85W vs 30W.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 85W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro W5500M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (3,470 vs 3,390), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro W5500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 10nm. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro W5500M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro W5500M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro W5500M

The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro W5500M scores 3,470 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 7 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500M	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score	3,470+2%	3,390
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node	7 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	1408+1367%	96

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500M	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro W5500M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro W5500M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500M and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500M	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500M	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5500M	Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Encoder	VCN 2.0	QuickSync
Decoder	VCN 2.0	QuickSync
Codecs	HEVC,H.264,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro W5500M draws 85W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 95.7% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.