
Radeon Pro W5500X vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro W5500X is positioned at rank #124 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro W5500X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $500 for the Radeon Pro W5500X, it costs 85% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 613.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+613.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500X and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro W5500X scores 7,351 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 7%. The Radeon Pro W5500X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,351 | 7,869+7% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+71% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS+81% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1757 MHz+6% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+71% | 56 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5500X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon Pro W5500X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+67% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500X draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 75W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 58.8 | 104.9+78% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500X launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 85% less ($425 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.7 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 613.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $149-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $75-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 104.9+614% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | TU117 |
| Release | December 11 2019 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #345 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















