CPU
GPU
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:
Quadro K2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is positioned at rank 148 and the Quadro K2200 is on rank 169, so the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4100
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K2200.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K2200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K2200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $85), it costs 53% less, resulting in a 106.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+106.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($85) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Quadro K2200
Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
Quadro K2200
The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 scores 3,682 and the Quadro K2200 reaches 3,580 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro K2200 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 640 (Quadro K2200). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,682+3% | 3,580 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+60% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.46 TFLOPS+71% | 1.439 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1201 MHz+7% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 320 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 2 MB (Quadro K2200) — the Quadro K2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 draws 50W versus the Quadro K2200's 68W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 350W (Quadro K2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-26% | 68W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 203mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.6+40% | 52.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $85, while the Quadro K2200 launched at $500 and now averages $40. The Quadro K2200 costs 52.9% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.3 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 89.5 (Quadro K2200) — the Quadro K2200 offers 106.7% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro K2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-20% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $85 | $40-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.3 | 89.5+107% |
| Codename | Baffin | GM107 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #526 | #534 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Quadro K2200
