Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4170

2016Core: 1125 MHzBoost: 1201 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7650K

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 4170

2016

Why buy it

  • 369.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A8-7650K

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4170 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 369.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 279.1% in PassMark G3D (2,870 vs 757), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro WX 4170 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 4170 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon R7 A8-7650K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4170

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,870 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7650K

The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 757 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 4170 scores 2,870 versus the Radeon R7 A8-7650K's 757 — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 leads by 279.1%. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7650K uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 825 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 A8-7650K
G3D Mark Score
2,870+279%
757
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024+167%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.46 TFLOPS+288%
0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1201 MHz+46%
825 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
64+167%
24
L1 Cache
256 KB+167%
96 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 A8-7650K
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7650K carries 512 MB. Radeon Pro WX 4170 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4170 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7650K. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) — the Radeon Pro WX 4170 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 A8-7650K
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 A8-7650K
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only),AV1 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 A8-7650K).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 A8-7650K
Encoder
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 6.3
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only),AV1 (Decode Only)
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7650K's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-7650K is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7650K). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 A8-7650K
TDP
50W
30W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
70-13%
Perf/Watt
57.4+128%
25.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 4170 came in at $400, while the Radeon R7 A8-7650K launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7650K was 100+% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs Infinity (Radeon R7 A8-7650K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7650K offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4170 (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4170Radeon R7 A8-7650K
MSRP
$400
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
7.2
Infinity
Codename
Baffin
Opal
Release
November 10 2016
January 9 2014
Ranking
#526
#890

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.