G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon RX 6700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon RX 6700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 4170

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 175W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
5.5% HIGHER MSRP
$400 MSRPvs$379 MSRP

Radeon RX 6700

2021

Why buy it

✅302.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Delivers 595.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.9 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅150% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌250% higher power demand at 175W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 6700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 302.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 559.2% in PassMark G3D (18,920 vs 2,870), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 10 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Pro WX 4170 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, and 36 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 6700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $21 cheaper on MSRP at $379 vs $400, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 595.8% (49.9 vs 7.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro WX 4170 vs Radeon RX 6700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 4170

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,870 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6700

The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 4170 scores 2,870 versus the Radeon RX 6700's 18,920 — the Radeon RX 6700 leads by 559.2%. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 6700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 2450 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon RX 6700
G3D Mark Score	2,870	18,920+559%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1024	2304+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.46 TFLOPS	11.29 TFLOPS+359%
Boost Clock	1201 MHz	2450 MHz+104%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	64	144+125%
L1 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6700 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon RX 6700
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 carries 10 GB. Radeon RX 6700 gives you 150% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4170 and 160-bit on the Radeon RX 6700. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) — the Radeon RX 6700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon RX 6700
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	10 GB+150%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	160-bit+150%
L2 Cache	1 MB	3 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon RX 6700
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only),AV1 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon RX 6700
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	VCE
Decoder	UVD 6.3	UVD
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only),AV1 (Decode Only)	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4170 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 6700's 175W — a 111.1% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4170 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 550W (Radeon RX 6700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon RX 6700
TDP	50W-71%	175W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	—	267mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	57.4	108.1+88%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 4170 came in at $400, while the Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6700 was 5.3% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4170) vs 49.9 (Radeon RX 6700) — the Radeon RX 6700 offers 593.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6700 (2021 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 4170	Radeon RX 6700
MSRP	$400	$379-5%
Performance per Dollar	7.2	49.9+593%
Codename	Baffin	Navi 22
Release	November 10 2016	June 9 2021
Ranking	#526	#90

Search Radeon Pro WX 4170 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 6700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.