Radeon Pro WX 5100
VS
GeForce GTX 950

Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs GeForce GTX 950

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016Core: 713 MHzBoost: 1086 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950

2015Core: 1024 MHzBoost: 1188 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is positioned at rank #132 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 5100

#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
99%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
94%
#117
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1341%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
100%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
97%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
97%
#136
Quadro P3000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
97%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
91%
#140
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
91%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
90%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
90%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
89%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
87%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
87%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
86%
#147
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 295.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 5100GeForce GTX 950
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+295.3%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 950 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950 holds the technical lead. Priced at $48 (vs $120), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 143.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 5100GeForce GTX 950
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+143.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)
More affordable ($48)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 5100 and GeForce GTX 950

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 scores 5,500 and the GeForce GTX 950 reaches 5,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 950 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 950). Raw compute: 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950). Boost clocks: 1086 MHz vs 1188 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100GeForce GTX 950
G3D Mark Score
5,500+3%
5,357
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792+133%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.892 TFLOPS+113%
1.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1086 MHz
1188 MHz+9%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112+133%
48
L1 Cache
448 KB+56%
288 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100GeForce GTX 950
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 295.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) — the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100GeForce GTX 950
VRAM Capacity
7.906 GB+295%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100GeForce GTX 950
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12_1
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100GeForce GTX 950
Encoder
VCE 3.4
NVENC 2nd Gen
Decoder
UVD 6.3
NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 950's 90W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 202mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100GeForce GTX 950
TDP
75W-17%
90W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
173mm
202mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
82°C
Perf/Watt
73.3+23%
59.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 and now averages $48. The GeForce GTX 950 costs 60% less ($72 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.8 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 111.6 (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 143.7% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100GeForce GTX 950
MSRP
$499
$159-68%
Avg Price (30d)
$120
$48-60%
Performance per Dollar
45.8
111.6+144%
Codename
Ellesmere
GM206
Release
November 18 2016
August 20 2015
Ranking
#416
#425