
Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Radeon Pro WX 5100
Popular choices:

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is positioned at rank 132 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q is on rank 16, so the Quadro P2000 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 5100
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 97.6% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P2000 Max-Q.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+97.6%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX 5100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Radeon Pro WX 5100
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 scores 5,500 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1086 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500+3% | 5,353 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+133% | 768 |
| Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | 1468 MHz+35% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 97.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 7.906 GB+98% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 draws 75W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W — a 6.5% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-6% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 73.3+10% | 66.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | — |
| Codename | Ellesmere | GP107GL |
| Release | November 18 2016 | July 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #416 | #426 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















